Wilks Score Male
Calculator
Results
- Wilks coefficient
- 0.800999
- Wilks score
- 200.249827
Results
| Wilks coefficient | 0.800999 |
| Wilks score | 200.249827 |
formula-map diagram
- Wilks coefficient
- 0.800999
- Wilks score
- 200.249827
Diagram
Formula
Wilks(2020, M) = total × 600 ÷ (a+b·bw+c·bw²+d·bw³+e·bw⁴+f·bw⁵)= 0.80099931192403
Note
This is a simplified sports-science model for general guidance, not medical or coaching advice.
More in Fitness and sports
See all →Frequently asked questions
What does the Wilks score measure?+
It's a coefficient-based score that adjusts a male lifter's total (squat, bench, deadlift) for body weight, allowing fair strength comparisons between lifters of different sizes. A higher Wilks score indicates greater relative strength regardless of how much the lifter weighs.
Why can't I just compare raw totals between lifters of different weights?+
Heavier lifters have a natural leverage and muscle-mass advantage that lets them move more absolute weight, so raw totals unfairly favor bigger lifters. Wilks applies a polynomial formula based on body weight to normalize totals onto a comparable scale.
Why is there a separate Wilks formula for men and women?+
Body composition and strength-to-weight relationships differ systematically between sexes, so a single formula would misrepresent relative strength for one group. The male and female Wilks coefficients use different polynomial constants fitted to each population's data.
Has the Wilks formula been replaced by newer scoring systems?+
Yes, many federations have shifted to the newer DOTS or IPF GL Points formulas, which were recalibrated on more recent and diverse competition data. Wilks is still widely used and referenced historically, but check which system your federation currently uses for official rankings.
What is considered a strong Wilks score?+
Recreational lifters often score in the 250-350 range, competitive amateurs 350-450, and elite/world-class lifters can exceed 500. These bands vary by weight class and lifting federation, so treat them as rough context rather than strict benchmarks.