Correlation R Squared
Calculator
Results
- Coefficient of determination (R²)
- 0.722499
- Explained variance (%)
- 72.249999
- Unexplained variance (%)
- 27.75
Statistical results
| Coefficient of determination (R²) | 0.722499 |
| Explained variance (%) | 72.249999 |
| Unexplained variance (%) | 27.75 |
formula-map diagram
- Coefficient of determination (R²)
- 0.722499
- Explained variance (%)
- 72.249999
- Unexplained variance (%)
- 27.75
Statistical relationship
Formula
R² = r²= 0.7225
Note
This is a simplified model: it applies the displayed standard formula to the summary values you entered and assumes their underlying conditions (independence, normality, correct sampling) hold. It does not analyse a real data set. Check the assumptions before relying on the result.
More in Statistics and probability
See all →Frequently asked questions
How is R² related to the correlation coefficient r?+
R² is simply r squared, the correlation coefficient multiplied by itself. Since r ranges from -1 to 1, squaring it always produces a value between 0 and 1, and R² loses the information about the direction of the relationship.
What does R² represent that plain correlation doesn't?+
R² represents the proportion of variance in one variable that's explained by the other, expressed as a fraction or percentage. An R² of 0.64 means 64% of the variability in the outcome can be statistically explained by the predictor.
Why does squaring r remove the positive/negative direction of the relationship?+
A strong negative correlation, like r = -0.9, and a strong positive correlation, like r = 0.9, both square to the same R² of 0.81. This is intentional, since R² is meant to describe the strength of explanatory power, not the direction, which is why you should keep the original r if direction matters.
What's a good R² value?+
It depends heavily on the field: in controlled physical experiments, R² above 0.9 might be expected, while in social science or behavioral research, an R² of 0.3 can be considered meaningful given how many other factors influence human behavior. There's no single universal threshold for 'good.'
Does a high R² prove that one variable causes the other?+
No, and this is one of the most common statistical misconceptions. R² only measures how well one variable statistically predicts or tracks another; a high R² can arise from a genuine causal link, a shared underlying cause, or pure coincidence.