Jackson Pollock 3site Male Bodyfat
Calculator
Results
- Estimated body density
- 1.067696
- Estimated body fat (%)
- 13.614894
Results
| Estimated body density | 1.067696 |
| Estimated body fat (%) | 13.614894 |
formula-map diagram
- Estimated body density
- 1.067696
- Estimated body fat (%)
- 13.614894
Diagram
Formula
Db = 1.10938 − 0.0008267·Σ + 0.0000016·Σ² − 0.0002574·age; %BF = 495/Db − 450= 1.0676965
Note
This is a simplified sports-science model for general guidance, not medical or coaching advice.
More in Fitness and sports
See all →Frequently asked questions
Which three skinfold sites does the Jackson-Pollock formula use for men?+
The male 3-site protocol measures skinfold thickness at the chest, abdomen, and thigh, using calipers to pinch and measure each fold. These three measurements plus age are entered into a regression equation to estimate body density and then body fat percentage.
How does skinfold thickness get converted into a body fat percentage?+
The sum of the three skinfold measurements and age are plugged into the Jackson-Pollock regression formula to estimate body density, which is then converted to body fat percentage using the Siri equation. Each step introduces some estimation error, so the final number is an approximation, not a lab-grade measurement.
How accurate is the 3-site method compared to methods like DEXA scanning?+
Skinfold methods are typically accurate within about 3-4% body fat for an experienced tester, less accurate than DEXA but far more accessible and affordable. Accuracy depends heavily on measurement technique, so inconsistent caliper use between tests undermines the result.
Why do I need a trained or consistent person to take these measurements?+
Skinfold measurement technique varies significantly between testers, including how the fold is pinched and exactly where on the body it's measured, so switching testers can introduce artificial swings in tracked results. Using the same person and the same measurement sites each time gives more reliable trend data than absolute accuracy.
Why might this formula be less accurate for very lean or very overweight men?+
The Jackson-Pollock equations were validated on a general population and tend to be less precise at the extremes of the body fat spectrum, where skinfold-to-total-fat relationships behave differently. For individuals far from average body composition, other methods may give a more reliable estimate.